On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 06:15:10PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > A changelog bloated with every replaced attempt is hard to read; gaps in > > version numbering that come without an explanation also raise an eyebrow > > (thus such a gap needs a comment in the changelog). > > How many replaced attempts are we typically talking about ? A lot?
> When an attempt is replaced, the reviewer would no doubt like not only > the whole new package, but a human-readable summary of what the > submitter has intentionally changed. How do you think that > human-readable summary ought to be communicated to the reviewer ? As a reply to the email containing the review? Please look at debian-mentors@ if you have additional questions. Thank you. -- WBR, wRAR
Description: PGP signature