Hi, On 17 April 2018 at 20:00, Thorsten Alteholz <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote: > > as requested by waldi ... >
With all due respect to yourself, waldi, and ftp-team (masters & assistants & wizards), I find this reject comment inappropriate, and not at all informative enough. As far as I can tell, the package uploaded is fully policy compliant as I have elaborated elsewhere (on the only concern I have managed to identify, with a reference from waldi, based on our informal IRC chat, which was a bit rude on waldi's part). I normally expect the reject emails to contain the technical descriptions of identified problems; and/or request for details and clarifications; or links to newly opened RC bug reports. I hope in the future, to continue receive reject emails, with similar content as I have been receiving previously for other rejected uploads. I have responded to the library version dependencies query from Kibi, elsewhere, please see that response for further details if you want to dive into that. This email is purely about the content of reject comment received from ftpmaster@. -- Regards, Dimitri.