On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:25:48PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I was seeking for remaining references to anonscm in packages in UDD. > I've found the following strange hit: > > udd=> select source, version, maintainer, vcs_browser, release from sources > where source = 'r-bioc-deseq2' and release = 'sid' ; > source | version | maintainer > | vcs_browser > | release > ---------------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------- > r-bioc-deseq2 | 1.16.1-1 | Debian Med Packaging Team > <debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org> | > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/r-bioc-deseq2.git | sid > r-bioc-deseq2 | 1.22.2+dfsg-1 | Debian R Packages Maintainers > <r-pkg-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net> | > https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-deseq2 | sid > (2 Zeilen) > > > which means the source package r-bioc-deseq2 exists twice in sid. There > is also an entry in tracker[1] mentioning version 1.16.1-1 which should > have gone since a long time. The situation is similar for:
[…] > Any idea why old versions of these packages might remain in UDD (and > thus probably in tracker since it is reading UDD)? cruft versions, usually hold up due to outdated binaries. In this case of r-bioc-deseq2, the reason is outdated binaries in kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386. using rmadison is a very quick way to notice this, as you will see the discrepancy in the architecture list. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature