On 2019-03-26 19:57, Daniel Reichelt wrote: > I'm wondering why there's no nvidia-smi:i386=410.104-1~bpo9+1 but only > 390.87-8~bpo9+1. > > Has the binary package just not been built yet for i386/stretch-bpo or > is nvidia-smi no longer supported for i386 by upstream?
Driver support for 32-bit architectures has been discontinued by NVIDIA after the 390.xx series. For i386 most of the libraries are still provided by the newer 410/418 series drivers. I.e. 32-bit (i386) binaries using OpenGL etc. are fine as long as they are running under a 64-bit (amd64) Xserver using the current drivers. The 390 legacy driver with all packages (renamed to include -legacy-390xx of course) on all previously supported platforms is still available as src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx. So the package is still there: nvidia-legacy-390xx-smi | 390.116-1~bpo9+1 | stretch-backports/non-free | amd64, i386 nvidia-legacy-390xx-smi | 390.116-1 | testing/non-free | amd64, armhf, i386 nvidia-legacy-390xx-smi | 390.116-1 | unstable/non-free | amd64, armhf, i386 Andreas PS: today I uploaded src:nvidia-graphics-drivers with transitional packages nvidia-driver, xserver-xorg-video-nvidia added on i386,armhf that depend on the corresponding legacy driver packages. I could do that for nvidia-smi as well. Any other (non-lib) packages?