On 13/04/19 at 09:28 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 10:20:53AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > TL;DR: see https://trends.debian.net and > > https://trends.debian.net/#smells > > that's beautiful! thank you! > > > [4] https://trends.debian.net/smells-dd-list.txt > > for me there are two smelly packages, src:tuxtype should use source 3.0 > indeed, but for src:piuparts I really don't see why. Though I would > quite probably agree that src:piuparts should not be native, and then > 3.0 would make more sense.
Well you could switch to 3.0 (native). Are there good reasons to stay with 1.0 for a native package ? Even if I agree that there's probably not much to gain, there's also even less to lose. > But you don't consider native packages as smelly, which I think you maybe > should. I'm not sure we have ever had a real discussion about that. But yes that might be true. It would make it easier to expose changes in derivatives. Lucas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
