On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 1:38 AM Adam Borowski wrote: > Thus, even though we'd want to stick with xz for the official archive, speed > gains from zstd are so massive that it's tempting to add support for it, > at least for non-official uses, possibly also for common Build-Depends.
Could we use custom zstd dictionaries on a per-architecture basis to further reduce the size of zstd packages, possibly allowing it to beat xz? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise