On May 29 2019, Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> wrote: > I'm certainly going to look at dck-buildpackage now, because what he > describes is a workflow I'd like to be using within Debian. > > For some projects I want to ignore orig tarballs as much as I can. I'm > happy with native packages, or 3.0 quilt with single-debian-patch. > I don't want merge artifacts from Debian packaging on my branches. > I'm happy to need to give the system an upstream tag. > I'm happy for a dsc to fall out the bottom, and so long as it > corresponds to my git tree I don't care how that happens. > I have a slight preference for 3.0 format over 1.0 format packages. 3.0 > makes it possible to deal with binaries, better compression and a couple > of things like that. The quilt bits are (in this workflow) an annoyance > to be conquered, not a value. > > The thing his approach really seems to have going for it is that he > gives up on the debian history fast forwarding and instead rebases a lot > for a cleaner history. > If we could figure out a way to collaborate on something like that well, > it might be a very interesting tool to have.
This sounds similar to the (now unmaintained) git-dpm to me. Best, -Nikolaus -- GPG Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«