On Lu, 19 aug 19, 11:55:13, Sam Hartman wrote:
> 
> I hope we also support the case where we ship a restricted unit file for
> non-systemd and a unrestricted unit file for systemd.

Would there be cases where the "restricted" unit file is using options 
not present in the "unrestricted" unit file, and if yes, is that case 
worth supporting?

It seems to me like a unit file to SysV translator should just ignore 
the options it doesn't support, so it wouldn't be necessary to have two 
different unit files.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to