On Lu, 19 aug 19, 11:55:13, Sam Hartman wrote: > > I hope we also support the case where we ship a restricted unit file for > non-systemd and a unrestricted unit file for systemd.
Would there be cases where the "restricted" unit file is using options not present in the "unrestricted" unit file, and if yes, is that case worth supporting? It seems to me like a unit file to SysV translator should just ignore the options it doesn't support, so it wouldn't be necessary to have two different unit files. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature