Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> writes:
> On September 5, 2019 7:36:01 AM UTC, Gard Spreemann <g...@nonempty.org> wrote: >>Can someone help clarify why the Qt 4 removal causes all of >>src:libqglviewer to be marked for removal? Surely its Qt 5 binaries >>could stay? > > All binaries from a source package are removed as a set, so if the Qt4 > packages are RC buggy, they all have to go. Ah, of course, that makes sense. Thanks. >>Is there any course of action I should take as maintainer of gudhi? I >>tried contacting the maintainer of libqglviewer a few weeks ago, but >>got >>no reply. > > You might investigate if there are remaining rdepends for the Qt4 > packages and if not, an NMU to drop them might be in order if you > continue not to hear from the maintainer. I see. The problem with that is I'm only a DM with uploading rights for a few packages. I'll try to contact the last uploader as well. Best, Gard
