On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:52 AM Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> wrote: > > Quoting Jonathan Carter (2020-03-05 10:44:50) > > On 2020/03/05 00:47, Sam Hartman wrote: > I agree for the _binary_ packages but not for the _source_ package. > > The changelog entry which Anthony referenced¹ says this: > > > * Add missing embedded epydoc and Bootstrap copyright info as well as > > non-minified source for bootstrap.min.css (Bootstrap v3.3.4) for > > DFSG compliance. > [...] > > * Symlink to bootstrap.min.css from libjs-bootstrap instead of > > shipping pydoctor included bootstrap.min.css v3.3.4 from 2015 > > As I understand the above, what was corrected for DFSG compliance was a > verification that the code included with the _source_ package was a > minification of css released by the Bootstrap3 project. > > I think that is a misunderstanding: Commonly this is indeed one way to > ensure DFSG compliance, but in this case - as Sam pointed out - it is > not enough. > > Source package must include the _source_ for the minified css, which in > this case is _not_ non-minified css but less code.
Good point! After reading your message, I went ahead and included the less source code from Bootstrap 3.3.4 and made a new upload of pydoctor, see: * https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/pydoctor/-/commit/f1c8209623b3b18e1d2019abcd2b1be1b04ab5d9 * https://tracker.debian.org/news/1107020/accepted-pydoctor-19110git2020030347424e7-1-source-into-unstable/ Cheers, Anthony