Richard Laager wrote on 19/01/2022: > On 1/18/22 11:21 AM, Paride Legovini wrote: > > I'd prefer making ntp a dummy package depending on ntpsec rather than > > having src:ntpsec takeover bin:ntp. > > If I understand correctly, you're suggesting src:ntp builds bin:ntp that > is a dummy package which depends on ntpsec?
That's what I had in mind, but the other option: > Another option would be to have src:ntpsec build the bin:ntp dummy > package and remove src:ntp entirely. also looks sensible to me after all. No strong opinion. Paride
