Regarding the following, written by "Joerg Jaspert" on 2022-10-08 at 16:12 Uhr +0200:
3. Thresholds for DAM action ----------------------------In various recent discussions we have noticed people mention that they "cannot say this, or DAM may expel them". This is not backed by facts (we've only had to go through with 8 expulsions since 2006) and it originates from wrong assumptions. DAM action is the last step in a long process, with others involved first.
This is not an accurate representation. There have been cases where DAM have threatened to expel (though the expulsion didn't happen, so didn't count in the statistics), and there was *no* long process with others involved first. In my case, you didn't even tell me details about the allegations (just the threat), nor heard my side of the story before wielding the big hammer.
Not interested in relitigating the past. But I cannot let you get away with claiming that DAM has always been impartial. Good if this has since changed, and you guys have put in place protocols to ensure your own accountability.
-- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems"i sometimes think that god
in creating man
somewhat overestimated his ability."
-- oscar wilde
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
