On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 5:58 PM Bastien Roucariès <ro...@debian.org> wrote: > Le vendredi 3 mars 2023, 22:35:24 UTC Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > Quoting Bastien Roucariès (2023-03-03 22:21:49) > > > Le lundi 27 février 2023, 12:11:27 UTC Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > Hi jonas, > > > > > > I have just checked the source code of lintian. Could you double check > > > your package and create a simple test case ? > > > > > > According to: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/blob/master/lib/Lintian/Check/Files/NonFree.pm#L91 > > > The test should not raise > > > > Sorry, I don't understand what you ask me to do. > > > > In case it was unclear from my previous posts: The rejection messages I > > shared was not from a lintian check done locally by me, but a rejection > > message I received from ftpmaster. > > > > Locally I did not experience the same messages. Are you asking me to > > test again that I (again) do not experience the kind of messages that > > ftpmasters for some reason unknown to me trigger? > > Yes could you double check ? > > If you do not experience the kind of messages with locally installed lintian, > it means that lintian need to be backported and that ftpmaster should install > a backport version.
I am still getting the LIntian autoreject for thawab for license-problem-md5sum-non-free. It is especially annoying that current Lintian does not emit this error or even a warning because it knows that thawab is in non-free. This is blocking me from being able to fix a RC bug in thawab unless I repack the tarball which seems like a lot of work for a package that is in non-free and a version that is **already in the archives**. I originally tried to fix this RC bug a year ago but my upload was auto-rejected then and I forgot to mark this issue for followup. It was an early enough upload that thawab could have landed in Debian 12. https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-islamic-maintainers/2023-January/004920.html Thank you, Jeremy Bícha