Hi folks, Not as quickly as hoped for, but we are getting close to having all the library transitions staged in experimental[0] with NMU patches in the BTS.
Thanks to improved analysis coverage of various packages, the total count of libraries transitioned has come down to something south of 1108+49=1157[1]. The count of reverse-dependencies to be binNMUed is now down to 5298+178=5476[2]. We have 1025 'pending' bugs filed with patches that will be mass-NMUed to unstable, plus an additional 46 packages[4] for which patches are available but which will not be included in the mass NMUs either because the packages FTBFS in unstable or because the maintainers have asked to handle these uploads directly; and 17 packages which have been identified as needing a transition but don't have soname-qualified library package names that accomodate inclusion in the mass-renaming. There is one outstanding bug for a package among the experimental uploads which needs usrmerge mitigation[6], and a small number of packages for which the NMU patches need to be fixed because the resulting binary packages are missing the actual libraries[7]. There are also a handful of packages still in flight for upload. I have coordinated with the gcc maintainer so that we can have the default flags in gcc-13 changed this week. We are therefore targeting Friday for the mass NMUs to unstable though there is a possibility this won't start until as late as Monday depending on capacity. I am including below for your review an annotated (unsorted) list of packages that were identified as packages to be NMUed but which have not been for one reason or another. # already in experimental abseil: failed # already in experimental ace: failed # already in experimental actor-framework: failed # ftbfs in unstable anfo: failed # ftbfs in unstable arrayfire: failed # already in experimental belle-sip: failed # already in experimental ceph: failed # already in experimental clamav: failed # can't rename libbinutils; just punt it binutils: failed # ftbfs in unstable libaws: failed # already in experimental libcdk5: failed # already in experimental libchipcard: failed # ada, who the hell knows libflorist: failed # already in experimental lib2geom: failed # ftbfs in unstable libcxx-serial: failed # already in experimental libhinawa: failed # already in experimental libkiwix: failed # ftbfs since 2021 libneo4j-client: failed # ftbfs in unstable, https://bugs.debian.org/1061493 consolekit2: failed # just mark so we don't try to upload; maintainer will handle libreoffice: failed # no sane ABI info; https://bugs.debian.org/1064308 libricohcamerasdk: failed # unsatisfiable build deps https://bugs.debian.org/1022008 librm: failed # ftbfs since 2018 https://bugs.debian.org/893023 librsl: failed # ftbfs in unstable https://bugs.debian.org/1050161 libtins: failed # ftbfs in unstable (unreported) libvirt-glib: failed # ftbfs in unstable https://bugs.debian.org/1006506 libzorpll: failed # ftbfs in unstable https://bugs.debian.org/1037752 lief: failed # already in experimental linphone: failed # ftbfs in unstable https://bugs.debian.org/1013421 lives: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps linpac: failed # ftbfs in unstable, https://bugs.debian.org/997441 squirrel3: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps swish-e: failed # ftbfs in unstable syndication: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps; https://bugs.debian.org/1063077 syslog-ng: failed # ftbfs in unstable https://bugs.debian.org/1060972 telepathy-farstream: failed # already in experimental unixcw: failed # FTBFS in unstable https://bugs.debian.org/1060107 urweb: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps uptimed: failed # ftbfs in unstable, previously unreported https://bugs.debian.org/1063044 vecgeom: failed # ftbfs in unstable https://bugs.debian.org/1061655; likely false positive anyway? wine: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps lldpad: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps linuxcnc: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps alsa-oss: failed # already in experimental bctoolbox: failed # no sane ABI info; https://bugs.debian.org/1063254 lua-luv: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps tcplay: failed # no sane ABI info; https://bugs.debian.org/1063275 r-bioc-rhtslib: failed # already in experimental vtk9: failed # closed invalid by maintainer xdp-tools: failed # ftbfs in unstable; https://bugs.debian.org/1060164 xeus-python: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps xine-lib-1.2: failed # already in experimental xmlsec1: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps; https://bugs.debian.org/1063316 xmorph: failed # FTBFS in unstable, https://bugs.debian.org/1062427 ghmm: failed # already in experimental gimp: failed # already in experimental gmerlin: failed # already in experimental; probably false positive, see https://bugs.debian.org/1062184 gnucap: failed # see https://salsa.debian.org/vorlon/armhf-time_t/-/merge_requests/128 gcc-10: failed # see https://salsa.debian.org/vorlon/armhf-time_t/-/merge_requests/128 gcc-11: failed # see https://salsa.debian.org/vorlon/armhf-time_t/-/merge_requests/128 gcc-12: failed # see https://salsa.debian.org/vorlon/armhf-time_t/-/merge_requests/128 gcc-13: failed # see https://salsa.debian.org/vorlon/armhf-time_t/-/merge_requests/128 gcc-14: failed # see https://salsa.debian.org/vorlon/armhf-time_t/-/merge_requests/128 gcc-9: failed # ftbfs in unstable, https://bugs.debian.org/984418 xqilla: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps yacas: failed # ftbfs in unstable, https://bugs.debian.org/1037908 yaramod: failed # already in experimental gpaste: failed # already in experimental htslib: failed # already in experimental ima-evm-utils: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps inn2: failed # ftbfs in unstable; https://bugs.debian.org/1002106 gr-dab: failed # ftbfs in unstable; https://bugs.debian.org/1064088 gutenprint: failed # already in experimental hdf5: failed # already in experimental lrcalc: failed # ftbfs in unstable mediastreamer2: failed # no sane ABI info; https://bugs.debian.org/1064193 lua-cqueues: failed # no sane ABI info; https://bugs.debian.org/1064187 luasocket: failed # false positive, has been resolved but results not yet updated mesa: failed # already in experimental mutter: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps nilfs-tools: failed # already in experimental nodejs: failed # no sane ABI info. still needs bug filed octave: failed # already in experimental opencascade: failed # already in experimental openimageio: failed # already in experimental openmm: failed # already in experimental opensubdiv: failed # already in experimental pam: failed # already in experimental poco: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps odin: failed # FTBFS in unstable, https://bugs.debian.org/1064139 ogre-1.12: failed # ftbs in unstable (#1019172) opengrm-ngram: failed # ftbfs in unstable (#1052380) opensm: failed # ftbfs in unstable (#1001528) purify: failed # already in experimental openmpi: failed # already in experimental poppler: failed # already in experimental protobuf: failed # already in experimental qt6-3d: failed # already in experimental qt6-base: failed # already in experimental qt6-declarative: failed # already in experimental qt6-tools: failed # already in experimental qt6-virtualkeyboard: failed # already in experimental qt6-wayland: failed # already in experimental qt6-webengine: failed # already in experimental qt6-websockets: failed # already in experimental qtbase-opensource-src-gles: failed # already in experimental qtbase-opensource-src: failed # already in experimental qtquickcontrols2-opensource-src: failed # already in experimental qttools-opensource-src: failed # already in experimental qtwayland-opensource-src: failed # already in experimental qtwebengine-opensource-src: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps quickplot: failed # already in experimental rem: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps regina-normal: failed # FTBFS in unstable, https://bugs.debian.org/1062880 saga: failed # FTBFS in unstable, https://bugs.debian.org/997264 seriousproton: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps sgb: failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps sipxtapi: failed # no sane ABI info; https://bugs.debian.org/1064328 snort: failed # obsolete, skip it python3.10: failed # soon to be obsolete skip it python3.11: failed # has to be handled manually, mark failed temporarily python3.12: failed Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org [0] that can be [1] https://people.canonical.com/~vorlon/armhf-time_t/source-packages + https://people.canonical.com/~vorlon/armhf-time_t/lfs-source-packages [2] https://people.canonical.com/~vorlon/armhf-time_t/reverse-depends-sources + https://people.canonical.com/~vorlon/armhf-time_t/lfs-reverse-depends-sources [3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org;tag=time-t#_2_3_5 [4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org;tag=time-t#_0_3_2 + https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org;tag=time-t#_0_3_1 [5] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org;tag=time-t#_0_2_4 [6] https://bugs.debian.org/1064298 [7] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/02/msg00156.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature