(it seems the forwarding broke the thread 😕)

On 2025-01-13 at 11:10 +0100, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:
> > normal dist-upgrade: 1m6.561s
> > eatmydata: 0m1.911s
> > force-unsafe-io: 0m9.096s
> 
> Thanks for these interesting figures. Could you please also provide 
> details about the underlying filesystem and storage stack, and the 
> effective mount options (cat /proc/fs/.../options)?
> 
> Cheers,

Sure.

This server has two (mechanical) disks, which are joined in a software
RAID 1, on top of which lies LUKS, which has an ext4 filesystem,
mounted with defaults,usrquota (i.e. rw,relatime,quota,usrquota,
data=ordered).

Then, docker is using aufs for the containers, which adds yet another
layer.

I'm afraid that if any of those is slowing things more than "normal",
it might be difficult to identify it.


reading /proc/fs/ext4/*/options:
> rw
> delalloc
> barrier
> user_xattr
> acl
> quota
> usrquota
> resuid=0
> resgid=0
> errors=continue
> commit=5
> min_batch_time=0
> max_batch_time=15000
> stripe=0
> data=ordered
> inode_readahead_blks=32
> init_itable=10
> max_dir_size_kb=0


Cheers


Reply via email to