Quoting Philipp Kern (2025-09-21 23:20:46) > On 9/21/25 11:05 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting NoisyCoil (2025-09-21 22:26:04) > >> On 21/09/25 10:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> > Please do not knowingly destabilize Debian unstable, but release known > >> > broken packages to experimental, re-releasing to unstable only when > >> > dependencies are all there. > > > >> [...] there's no such thing as > >> *knowingly* uploading broken packages to unstable in Rust team. > > [...] > >> what we do allow is uploading multiple dependent > >> packages to unstable/NEW at the same time. > > > > Please do not do that. When you know(!) that dependencies are not > > satisfied but are at the risk of month-long NEW queue processing, > > upload to experimental instead of to unstable. > > How do we know that? My most recent experiences with the NEW queue was > that it was fast. Now, post-release it seems to be slow again. I also > uploaded a couple of Go packages to unstable/NEW. I did not expect it to > take weeks. But those are new leaves. So is librust-tower-lsp-dev.
You don't know if NEW queue processing is seconds or months. You do know if you package depend only on packages already in unstable. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
