On 2025-11-16 10:42, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
Am 16.11.25 um 17:48 schrieb Simon Josefsson:
Reproducing whatever upstream say about copyright and licensing is
probably sufficient and the right thing to do regardless.

This approach carries the risk that non-free source code could still be 
published in Debian. As a community, we should take care to develop processes 
to minimize the risk of liability.

Whenever I update debian/copyright, I always rely exclusively on copyright 
statements made by upstream, specifically within the version of the code I'm 
packaging.

Are you suggesting a stricter standard?  Have I been performing this task 
negligently?


Best,
Antonio

Reply via email to