Am 14.01.26 um 19:22 schrieb Andrea Pappacoda:
My experience in the past has been that NEW processing for soname bumps was very quick, i.e. they were already handled differently than completely new packages.Hi Sebastiaan,Il giorno 14 gen 2026, alle ore 13:56, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]> ha scritto: It's shows that you don't maintain enough shared library packages with frequent SONAME bumps. Filing bugs for those is ludicrous, and would need to be an exception to this requirement opening the floodgates for more. Requiring bugreports for binary-NEW packages is a dumb idea, let's stop entertaining it.I’d argue that the real issue here is that SONAME bumps shouldn’t need to go to NEW, or at least not in the same queue as regular new packages. But this issue has been discussed at length in other threads, and I don’t want to resurrect the topic now.
Michael
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
