First Debian contains BSD licensed packages so it also matters.
Second Linux kernel is GPL licensed which is copyleft license.
My observation is that BSD license could be also consdiered
copyleft in sense that it guarantees that you do not need
to pay for it . MIT licese allows you to sell it but BSD
do not allow it. It even do not allow binary form to require be paid
opposite to GPLs. The only difference is that GPL force distributor to
provide
source code while BSD do not require it. From one perspective it could
be consdier worse, but I had experiece of distributing modified by me MPL
code which also has that kind of obligation and I got sick and did not
done backup, so I did not comply.
Third I cosndier debian mailing list readers interesting locutors.
W dniu 31.01.2026 o 13:16, Andrey Rakhmatullin pisze:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 12:21:32PM +0100, Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
That is question for lawyers not programmers.
Yet you wrote to debian-devel@. Can you please explain if you have
some quetions or sugestions regarding the topic of this mailing list?
Thanks.
