On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 11:23:55AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 3/3/26 10:53 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On 2026-03-02 22:42, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > On 3/2/26 08:34, Russell Coker wrote: > > > > The RTS game Warzone 2100 which has etensive 3D graphics currently > > > > doesn't > > > > build on armhf (32bit ARM), i386, s390x, and riscv64. > > > Refering to the release policy [1], you only need to spend *reasonably* > > > effort on supporting release architectures. The first one to make the > > > call what is reasonable is you. If things FTBFS, you can request removal > > > by filing an RM bug against the ftp.debian.org pseudo package and as long > > > as the build fails, you don't need to do anything further. Once the > > > binaries on unsupported architectures are gone from unstable, the > > > migration to testing will no longer be blocked by those FTBFS. See also > > > [2]. > > > > Please then also document it in the Architecture field of the source > > package. That will avoid build failures on the buildds that need triaging. > > Thanks! > > To get that in the archive you'd need to do another upload, for the next > upload you should just use the unsupported-architecture build dependency to > exclude the architecture(s): > > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#being-kind-to-porters
BTW is the unsupported-architecture example given on that page wrong? I mean, it says to B-D on unsupported-architecture [!the-not-supported-arch], and I think that's... kind of backwards? (I know, I know, Git and reportbug are my friends :)) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] PGP key: https://www.ringlet.net/roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
