On 02/05/26 04:20, Charles Plessy wrote:
SIL OFL 1.1 309
Hi, does license-count distinguish between plain OFL (SPDX: OFL-1.1-no-RFN) and OFL with Reserved Font Name (SPDX: OFL-1.1-RFN)? Or does this mean "OFL 1.1 with or without RFN" (SPDX: OFL-1.1)?
OFL-1.1-no-RFN definitely belongs in the list of common licenses, OFL-1.1-RFN cannot be included because the Reserved Font Name is part of the license (so a single text cannot suffice), and the ambiguous OFL-1.1 is kind of problematic because Debian must follow different rules for no-RFN and RFN fonts. (Although, truth be told, at the moment the archive is not really "clean" from this point of view.)
Regards, -- Gioele Barabucci
