Hi,

> > I also suggest you check out
> > https://github.com/mysql/mysql-server/graphs/contributors?from=5%2F25%2F2024
> > to see how development activity is slowing down and note that out of
> > the top-6 developers only two still seem to be employed by Oracle.
>
> While it is true that mysql is basically an Oracle-only project at this
> point, I have already pointed out[1] that the linked GitHub graph is
> misleading as it only shows commits to the default branch, while
> development apparently happens in other branches (like "9.7"[2]).

The two-year stat at
https://github.com/mysql/mysql-server/graphs/contributors?from=5%2F25%2F2024
is not misleading for the commits published there. It is perfectly
fine to assess the trend over the past two years even if the latest
commits are missing. The 9.7 branch was the trunk up until
December/January so that stats page also shows the history of
declining activity while they worked on 9.7.

The maintenance branches 8.4 and 9.7 will show mainly the same bug
fixes applied to both and will reflect only stable maintenance
activity, which is good to know, but wasn't the point here when
discussing the overall trajectory of MySQL and what might happen to
future versions.

Reply via email to