On Sat, Aug 29, 2026 at 03:02:03PM +0200, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
Unlike the copyright question. There IMHO we do not have much useful to contribute at this time. Let the courts run their course. When that process is completed, there might be legislative changes demanded from the politicians. At *that* point it *might* necessary to validate that these changes are compatible with free software needs. Before that all we would be doing would be just pure bikeshedding in hypotehtical clouds.
I also think that our next discussion should distinguish between locally running LLMs and cloud LLMs. The way things are going, locally running LLMs will be an alternative, and then you can much better control what was the training data and the Freeness of the thing.
Being the proponent of the winning option, I am of course happy with this outcome, but I regret the loss of contributors (which would have happened with either option winnign). It is just too early to take a final decision on the mater. Let's revisit this in two years or so, and let this mess of a GR be a warning for our future selves.
Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
