Hi Simon, Am Sonntag, 11. Oktober 2026, 06:57:53 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Simon Richter: > Hi, > > On 10/11/26 02:19, Patrick Franz wrote: > > > * Package name : union > > That is a very generic name. Would it make sense to name it > "qt6-union", to make it more clear which ecosystem it belongs to?
Yes, the name is rather generic but this is what upstream calls it. I'd like to keep upstream names as much as possible. Otoh, we have packages with rather generic names such as calendarsupport and mailcommon in the archive as well. They are specific to Qt/KDE as well and not generic/common at all. If the name union is an issue, then plasma-union would be a better name. -- Med vänliga hälsningar Patrick Franz
