Le mar. 27 oct. 2026 à 21:57, Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 09:53:23PM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> This doesn't answer your question, but FWIW, it looks like the git > >> repository for the review tool is > >> https://salsa.debian.org/dfsg-team/dfsg-omp-review/ > > > > > >This tool is somewhat installable, provided one manages to build it. > >Let's say I managed to build it, now I can get the same review, but done > >with another LLM > >than the one used by DFSG. > > > >The result is comparable (though the wording is somewhat different). > >I didn't have to wait, and got the result several minutes later. > > > >BTW omp seems an odd, opinionated choice, to me. A more generic tool would > >be better. > > Well, > > https://salsa.debian.org/dfsg-team/dfsg-omp-review/#i-maintain-debian-packages-should-i-use-this > suggests that this tool is not very useful outside the team. > My intent was about reproducing and learning your tools. Also, if I'm going to upload ten new packages, I'd rather have the automated analysis at once, than receiving delayed emails one at a time (sometimes > 20mn wait), and use it to avoid stupid mistakes that I couldn't have avoided with lintian. Maybe all we are talking about is the next generation of lintian. Could we have a lintian mcp ? > -- > WBR, wRAR >
