Scott Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, you're not hiding this on the bug tracking system any more. >
Come on, cool down! That�s a bad way to get this resolved. Please DON�T do that again. I think -private would have been more apropriate. I know everybody is getting nervous in this deep freeze. So please consider: Is the bad behaviour (the bug) really that critical or will the solution introduce new behaviour? In addition, I think it should be in the hands of the maintainer what is considered a bug or a feature. This follows close from the main principle in free software: The one who does the work, is the one who decides. (And decide is meant to cover almost everything about a piece of software: if you don�t like it, feel free to open a competition by changing and releasing it the way you like --- see discussion on name for deity, no: apt, or emacs vs. xemacs). And don�t forget, we all play on the same team. grimaldi alias Jens Ritter --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key ID: 2048/E451C639 Jens Ritter Key fingerprint: 5F 3D 43 1E 24 1E CC 48 1E 05 93 3A A7 10 73 37 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
