Omegaman writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Omegaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > No, editing /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf is the wrong way. The format of it > > changed completely. > > So I should probably copy texmf.cnf.dpkg.dist over the orignal and > edit to my system (if needed). No problems so far at any rate.
Weird ... > > > Did the installation process of tetex-bin ask you if you want to > > replace texmf.cnf and you said no? I just found out about this problem > > Nope. It didn't ask. What's debian's policy when an upstream > update changes config files and thus breaks a package? > > > and wrote a fix for this, so that the new file is installed > > anyway. But you have to merge in your changes by yourself (using > > texconfig). > > I'll try an apt-get ugrade > > Thanks for replying. I'll grab the latest tetex packages and let you > know if it doesn't work as we expect. I just release tetex-bin_0.9-7 and tetex-base_0.9-9, but this will take some time to come to the mirrors. Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]