[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory S. Stark) writes:
> > I asked once earlier, but no one responded: > > Does anyone know how PAM modules should be packaged? > Gregory, I'm sorry I cannot provide good technical information. I do > know that we had backed out PAM-ifying hamm sometime last year. I > think we should re-PAM-ify everything (i.e., pam version of login, > passwd, etc etc). I think PAM is stable now and should be embraced > for slink. > But I could certainly be wrong. I'd like to see PAM in slink. Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
