Wichert Akkerman writes: > Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > I think that not only should bugs be marked by the > > distributions they exist in, they should also be classified by > > architecture; > > Actually, I think we can do the same way more efficent. Each bug already > has a Version-number. Now we if we add a field Fixed-in-Version the BTS > can simply look for which architectures the fixed version is available.
No, that's not so simple. As already explained, and with a recent example, I fixed a specific bug in kbd_0.95-16 and kbd_0.96a-4. It does occur in all versions bewteen and including 0.96-1 and 0.96a-3. Filling a Fixed-in-Version field with either of 0.95-16 or 0.96a-4 would be wrong. We don't want that. -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer, isp-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | more powerful, more stable ! http://www.mygale.org/~ydirson/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
