On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 09:49:22PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: > >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dan> See, it's not "Is anyone going to?" or "Do we agree we > Dan> should?" right now. It's "does anyone but Dan have the time > Dan> to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why > Dan> the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose source is there is > Dan> missing a lot of important symbols". I can't figure it out. > > Ben> The source in http://master.debian.org/~dan in the libstdc > Ben> sir is for 2.9. Could this be the problem? > > Dan> I present > Dan> http://master.debian.org/~dan/libstdc/libstdc++_2.90.29-1.dsc > Dan> for your enjoyment... > > Dan> Notice it says Binary: libstdc++2.8. > > Wow. How does 2.90 compile out to become 2.8?
The same way egcs 1.1b becomes gcc 2.91.53. The one is an interface number and the other an internal version. Dan