Joel Klecker wrote: > close 41352
Why is it so difficult to fix bugs instead of closing bug reports without fixing the bugs? > thanks :( > >Please fix bugs! How should the user read compressed HTML > >files? Could you tell me one internet page sending > >compressed html documents to the user? > Show me where the bug is; Without any problems: install a non unix/linux operating system and use netscape or another browser. How can you read these documents? -> This is a bug. > show me where policy says I can't compress HTML. This is not a topic of the policy. With the same arguments you could compress compiled programs. > lynx has no problem with it and I had no trouble getting > netscape to display it over HTTP. Some netscape installation (even under Linux) have got problems with these files. And of course thereīre other browsers. > plain text files too, are you gonna say that those should be > uncompressed too in case someone wants to browse > <http://localhost/doc/>? No I donīt say that. But compressed HTML files are as broken as gzip compressed jpeg/gif files produced by programs like debmaker and debhelper. > >And why donīt you want dhelp support? A lot of users like > >these systems. Why is it so difficult to add such an > >entry? If you need help tell me. > a) I haven't had anyone besides you ask for it Then I would suggest reading magazines like the famous German cīt. They have recognized Debianīs documentation chaos. > b) I don't like dhelp Why? I donīt like broken packages like your. > c) it's one tiny little document And itīs one tiny little configuration file for dhelp or doc-base or dwww. Whereīs the problem to add such a small file? HTML is Debianīs documentation format, so please make it readable. Thank you. cu, Marco -- -- Linux HOWTOs: Die besten Lösungen der Linuxgemeinde -- ISBN 3-8266-0498-9 Uni: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fido: 2:240/6298.5 Mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/
