On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:28:49PM -0800, Brent Fulgham wrote: > Can anyone refresh my memory as to the legality of encryption-enabled builds > of software inside the U.S. Did we (like Kernel.org) decide it was okay to > host this in U.S.-based servers, or are we still recommending > that members of the free world do such builds?
We haven't change the definition of the non-US distributions, so encryption stuff should still be uploaded to non-US/main or similar. On the other hand, the US have changed their stance on encryption, so there's no problem with US people uploading to non-US/main. That's my understanding anyway. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG encrypted mail preferred. ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.'' -- Linus Torvalds
pgpwiAzB6lgN3.pgp
Description: PGP signature