On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:02:23PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Alexander Koch wrote: > > DUL is interesting. I changed my mind on that. I rather say > > we use it since the amount of spam is certainly increasing > > the last weeks and DUL is understandable. > > Yes there is more spam, but I've been looking and I haven't seen that much > (if any at all) would be blocked by DUL.
I personally think the DUL is "most harmless" RBL and the "most legitimate" (bad wording probably) for use. And if it only catches on spam a week it is worth it, methinks. I do not have the exact figures, unfortunately. Alexander