Torsten Landschoff said: > I don't quite remember. I think I contacted inria (they hold the Caml > copyright) about changing that but to no extent. I am not sure if changing > the MoSML license would help - at least it has to go to non-free then. > I did not want to maintain a non-free package at that time so I gave up on > it.
They changed the license on OCaml to the QPL recently. It's not GPL compatible, and it's not the nicest license in the world, but it is a free license the Moscow ML people could work with.