Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: >... > >I assume that since the need for such a procedure starts to arise now >we have several people working on one document, we'll start discussion >this (real) soon (this is where Christian comes in :-). I've already >some ideas for this, so maybe we can start this discussion shortly? > >So, since I already got your version, I could simply put it in my CVS >repository and put out a new version of the complete manual. On the >other hand I already saw some suggestions for improvements, so I think >it's better if you first gather all comments, work them out, and then >we'll put it in the official sources. What do you think?
I've incorporated the suggested changes. Should I continue to upload through the list? It is certainly likely that there will be further changes, after all. > >As far as the integration is concerned, you could keep your chapter in >a separate file and write in another file an empty framework to keep >SGML happy. Using so-called entities you "include" your chapter into >the framework. That's how I'm organizing the manual to keep including >source updates easy. That's what I did; the particular point I had was that I had to alter debiandoc.dtd in order to define the entity for inclusion into the skeleton manual. That seems quite undesirable. Have I misunderstood how to do this in SGML? -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1 Unsolicited email advertisements are not welcome; any person sending such will be invoiced for telephone time used in downloading together with a �25 administration charge. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
