Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > The point here was that we should get the text output from an SGML > source via HTML and a browser. Then the way the text output would > look like would be dependent on the way the browser interprets the > HTML source. That's not the way to go in my opinion.
versus the way that some other tool interprets it you mean ? I'm being picky. > I read an announcement yesterday that SGML-Tools would start changing > over to using the DocBook DTD somewhere later this year. Let's follow > their findings. Really? That's interesting. They must have changed their minds again. Terry -- E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
