Am 16.04.98 schrieb apharris # burrito.onshore.com ... Moin Adam!
APH> Did you read the doc-base documention yet, Marco? No, sorry, I don#t have it. APH> It is the document ID. Currently, in doc-base (and this affects your APH> new document standard registration format you proposed) every document APH> may have one and only one Debian-unique ID. Each document id has a Could you explain, why we need a document ID? APH> control file (in /usr/share/doc-base). That#s not good. Keep packages like doc-linux in mind. APH> Each document id may have many APH> formats. I think we don#t need this ID, we need only a tag to separate two documents in ony file (like <item>). APH> Yes, but it is a field that actually makes sense to speakers of APH> English, unlike "linkname". Ok, I agree. APH> Sure. Arguably. Then I could have an index on authors. You could APH> sort by author. I#m not sure, this tag should be optional. APH> What? Sorry, HTML should be allowed in abstract, right? APH> I'm not quite sure what's up with these. Christian, can you recount APH> the justification for these? Maybe he uses it for a search engine? I think, we should drop it. APH> It's name is SGML. (Mark my words, MSWord will support XML this APH> year.) :). I don#t think so. But who uses Word :). It#s LaTeX time. cu, Marco -- Uni: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fido: 2:240/5202.15 Mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
