Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Apr 16, 1998 at 07:33:56AM -0400, Adam P. Harris wrote: > > We have two major policy issues to solve immediately (although it is > > definatly too late for hamm, of course): > > > > (a) standardize document registration format > > (b) standardize document display heirarchy / index
> Please let me try to cope with (b). I already volunteered, and no > objections till yet. > > I did post a lot of mails today (sorry for the delay). I will > explain myself saturday or earlier. I try to get all under a single > (probably big) hat. Rock on. You won't see me object! I assume you're writing it with debiandoc-sgml, right? Are we gearing this for inclusion in doc-base itself? Or for inclusion in the policy? Personally, I see it as part of doc-base, at least for as far in the future as I can see. Perhaps we should build doc-base out of CVS? I'm already managing doc-base source in CVS locally. Let me know if I should contact <debian-admin> and ask them to set up a repository at the standard location. Perhaps a lower-overhead solution would be if you simply emailed me drafts -- whatever is okay with me. [Christian] > Why do you think that two levels are too deep? Please keep in mind > that eventually _all_ packages (nearly 2000 now) will register > manuals, so with a single level of sections you wouldn't find any > document! I don't think two or three or even four are too deep. Christian, I am a little behind in email; I think my reaction was against the *first* proposal you made. .....A. P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
