Am 30.04.98 schrieb apharris # burrito.onshore.com ... Moin Adam!
APH> > Ok, but Links should only used for sections and not for documents. APH> Strongly disagree. Support why you don't want to allow documents to APH> be present in multiple sections; I think you don#t see it. You can of course register one document in more than one section. But you can not add a *link* to a document. You can add links only to directories. Ok? APH> > And remember we should support URLs: APH> > "File: http://...."; APH> Should we? Wasn#t that your suggestion some weeks ago? And I really like this idea. This is for example interesting, to add cgi Skripts to the index. APH> wanting maybe to have 'Original-Source: http://...' pointing to an APH> upstream, more live or possibly more up-to-date copy (i.e., say it's a APH> dump of a faq-o-matic or something). I think that there#re a lot of cases where http:// makes sense. Maybe we should have a "Format: html-link"? APH> You're muddling section registration with document registration. No No. I was talking about document registrations. cu, Marco -- Uni: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fido: 2:240/5202.15 Mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
