I didn't really address this whole mail. On Fri, 10 Jul 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you ask me, I think the RMS is on the wrong path with texinfo. > SGML is the whisper of the future. Maybe you want to ask him if they > dont want to donate a texinfo backend to jade dsssl engine? >
How much work is involved here? I see the existing DSSSL source for other formats is around 9000 lines according to wc. Is this something likely to happen if there's interest, or a huge pain they'd have to pay someone to do? > However, I dont know how texinfo looks like. If it uses standard > markup, you may come around using a small converter, but it will > never be optimal. > Yeah, that sounds yucky. There's no good solution really. A new dsssl backend would be ideal, but I'm certainly not going to write it. Thanks for the info. Havoc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
