Am 09.07.98 schrieb Marcus.Brinkmann # ruhr-uni-bochum.de ... Moin Marcus!
MB> I think there are indeed problems, for example if two packages want MB> register the same home page. I don't think this is very likely, but I MB> think it is very likely that two packages may want to register the same MB> relative path in your proposal. The path is relative in the docreg file but not in the database! There#s no difference, sorry. MB> > But we will have something like general/howto. MB> No, we will not have something like this. ??? Some month ago we both agreed, that we will have such a section. MB> There is no way you can make me including some shit like "general/howto" MB> that tells the user NOTHING, now that we have te notion of the "Type:" MB> element. That you don#t like a howto section is not an argument. MB> > Maybe nice, but a system like dhelp needs its own databases. I need a MB> > special sorting of the data. MB> Seems like a design flaw of dhelp. Please stop telling me such a nonsense :(. Why should I sort the data every time a package installs a new document? This would be a design flaw. MB> > If I (as package maintainer) would for example move HOWTO/ to HOWTO/html MB> > all links to the HOWTOs will be broken with both solutions. MB> ???? You would have to update your docreg files, wouldn't you? The links of translations to this package would be broken! This shows that your propsal uses filenames as identifier. MB> > Rebuild the database. MB> This reminds me too much of reinstall windows. We can do better. Is this one of your technical objections? Please tell me a better solution. cu, Marco -- Uni: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fido: 2:240/5202.15 Mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
