Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip] > > Changing subject: is there any plan to move from the Debiandoc-SGML > > markup to DocBook? My understanding is that SGML-tools team did > > already the move for version 2.0. > > If they jumped off a cliff would you? > > Did I already respond to this?
Yes, you did, but that doesn't matter. ;-) > I personally fear that our curve for new documenters is already high > enough (make, cvs, SGML in any form), and that using a complex DTD > like docbook is going to make things worse. > > Mind you, I love docbook; I use it all the time for work. But I'm not > really bugged that much by Debiandoc-SGML. Since it is specific to > debian, I feel it's a more focused DTD which works really well for us > (kudos to Ardo). Thank you!!! I agree. Once we've a good amount of documentation written and there actually is a need for something bigger we can always move over. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://www.tip.nl/users/ardo.van.rangelrooij PGP fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
