On 23 Nov 1998, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Here's the license from the sysadmin guide. Looks DFSG-free to me: > > [snip]
That one looks like the standard FSF doc license, or close to it. The User's Guide uses that *and* the GPL, LIGS uses only the GPL... but the LDP page says their official license is a non-free one (no modifications without permission). I wonder which docs use the bad license? So far every one I've seen uses some free license. *shrug* Havoc PS: Adam, I will respond to your other mail tomorrow, too tired now.
