On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Josip Rodin wrote: > > I presume you're the maintainer (haven't read the document in > while). The reason why I wanted it in DDP tree, is purely technical, > and for convenience sake - as you may have noticed, we are trying > to put some documents from the sources to the web pages, and having > tutorial in the same directory with same (well, not same but alike) > Makefile makes it easier. However, it is possible to handle it even > if it's not in the same branch. > Also, if tutorial was in the DDP tree it would feel more integrated. > Well, at least to me it would, since we already have FAQ in the DDP > tree and tutorial would round it up. >
Makes sense. If you do this be sure the new Makefile includes equivalent targets as my current one (in particular the DOS text target). > AFAIK, DDP CVS tree is readable and writable by any Debian developer. > I hope you don't have a problem with that - and I think we can assure > you noone will write anything in it without considering maintainer's > (your) opinion. > No problem with that. > I don't want you to feel anyone forced you to move it, especially > because reasons are purely political and aesthetic. > I'm in favor of the move, as long as I don't have to figure out how to do it. :-) Havoc
