>>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Kreimeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bernd> The last time I looked (I am currently not on the LDP list), Bernd> HOWTO writer's etc. were urged/encouraged/whatever to move to Bernd> DocBook. For months, I kept occasionally installing and Bernd> removing 1.x and 2.x. I am simply not in the position to learn Bernd> Python just to get the package installed. I won't switch to Bernd> RedHat either. Good for you! ;) >> Aside from that, if you are trying to support sgml-tools 2.x on >> Debian, based on my rather foggy (it was a while ago) remembrance Bernd> Thanks for trying. If only somebody could be specific for once, Bernd> then I'd happily write it down as a fool-proof (by my success) Bernd> INSTALL.debian. Well, if, as I claim, installing sgml-tools v2 is so easy on debian, then wouldn't it be easier/better to just provide the package? Then no need to write that document. I've emailed the current Debian maintainer (please continue CC the debian maintainer at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), asking what I can do to help get sgml-tools v2 into potato, including doing an NMU for him. One issue which I am uncertain about is whether we should just take the sgml-tools v1 package and *replace* it with a v2-based one, or whether we should provide *both* sgml-tools v1 and sgml-tools v2 (maybe a new pkg named sgml-tools-2). Thoughts from this list? Bernd> If the updated package gets uploaded to stable, I am sure there Bernd> are a few people on the lists who'd appreciate a short Bernd> notifier. Thanks for replying. We'll try to remember. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
