Mel Pullen wrote: > > I'm astounded. You want writers to assign copyright on GTK+ > documentation to a commercial organisation (Red Hat) ? It will > eventually be owned by IBM and any intellectual property rights will be > transferred. IBM is not as benign. > > What about all of the other documentation projects that offer variations > of the GPL ? DDP, LDP, OPL all serve to protect the users rights.
Can you give me URLs for these. I'd be happier with an open license, but the decision is not mine. I think RedHat just want to be sure they don't get into legal trouble when publishing the material. If we can provide a watertight open license they may accept it. Damon
