On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 11:44:34PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Actually, no, this is not in webwml, because the file is built differently > > for different architectures, and it'd be a bit harder to maintain if it was > > in wml. > > You don't understand. I know its processed by m4. But on > www.debian.org/releases/potato, that file (arch/i386/index.html) is > unnecessary and even disruptive. The Debian web site uses WML.
I disagree, it's useful, having directories without index.html is bad. If we put that in webwml, that means creating one dir per architecture, with a Makefile and an index.wml file. Aside from the cruftiness issue :) the problem is that other arches will most probably get out of sync with i386. If they're generated from a single source, that's less likely to happen. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
