On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:10:18AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > 3.7.3 TEX > > > > Is this section even necesary? Are there really manuals that can't > > use default pool sizes? If there are, wouldn't that be a TeX bug? > > Some of documents including mine usually run over limit of current TEX > in stable and testing. I heard new version in unstable will fix it but > testing script is frozen now. (I bet Javi's document is getting too > big. Something like 100 page is limit usually.)
I just tried to compile it. Ouch. See this:
$ make securing-debian-howto.en.pdf
debiandoc2latexpdf -l en -c securing-debian-howto.sgml
debiandoc2latexpdf: ERROR: securing-debian-howto.pdf could not be generated
properly
debiandoc2latexpdf: rerun with the -v option to found out why
debiandoc2latexpdf: or check the log file securing-debian-howto.log
make: *** [securing-debian-howto.en.pdf] Error 1
$ tail securing-debian-howto.log
(...)
Error: pdflatex: buffer overflow
$ wc securing-debian-howto.sgml
10176 57363 409543 securing-debian-howto.sgml
However:
$ make securing-debian-howto.es.pdf
debiandoc2latexpdf -l es securing-debian-howto.es.sgml
$ wc securing-debian-howto.es.sgml
697 7718 51009 securing-debian-howto.es.sgml
Which is a previous version (the translation is not uptodate yet)
So it seems we have a problem with PDF generation through LaTeX with long
documents
(who is the responsible? debiandoc-sgml? LaTeX?)
>
> > Also, that's not how TeX is spelled.
>
> My appologies.
I've fixed it (as well as LaTeX)
>
> > Suggest the be a note that doc-base entries are recommended, if not
> > required...
>
> OK. Please write and commit your idea to CVS.
>
I'll add a TODO item for the moment (until I get around to write it).
Regards
Javi
pgpfJkSBH8o9f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
