On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:10:06PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:15:50PM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:14:29AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > ... > > > > > > ,,text to be quoted'' this is how they do it. > ... > > > I think those silly hacks should be replaced with “ and ” or > > > something like that. > > > > True. it is a good idea for source to be standard. I will do so by > > providing tool to convert the source. (I did this since the source came > > in this manner mainly. So I standardized on it.) > > To be precise, I think this is what I should do. > > OLD: ,,text'' > NEW: „text” > > NB: > &ldquo seems to be high double-6 left quote. > &rdquo seems to be closing for &ldquo > > &rdquo and ” looks same to me as I see "Dookbook, The definitive > guide".
Hmmm... they produce both " and " even for HTML. Hmmm... not good. Osamu
