On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 01:54:54PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 01:17:13AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:25:56AM +0100, Javier Fern�ndez-Sanguino Pe�a > > wrote: > > > Ok, here's my proposal on how should DDP be restored: > Just my two cents for publishing: > > a. Remove all makefiles from the (future) alioth DDP repository. (ddp) > b. Remove all data/sgml files from current old-gluck repository. > > A script on gluck can automatically (over-)write all makefiles within > a checkout copy of the alioth repository, and publish soon after. > That's all. Little variants of this approach could be considered > (e.g.data files for selecting languages, etc.)
Yes. I also was thinking the same. 2 invocation of "cvs export" are the weay to do this :-) Now just fine additional points: a'. Remove all shell scripts from the (future) alioth DDP repository. b'. Move cleaned old-gluck repository to new-gluck repository (staff) Everything except last one can be done by one of us without asking Debian staff group people :-) Project Admins are a member of ddp. Osamu Osamu
